A Random Image

Archive for May, 2001

 
|| May 31, 2001 || 9:16 am || Comments (0) ||

Just in case you aren’t sure.

 
|| May 29, 2001 || 10:13 pm || Comments (0) ||

“Yeah baby, the rock star part of you is all Beck. Women are enthralled by your seductive energy, a perfect mix of intrigue and poetry. You and Beck have got it all together because you’re unafraid to say exactly what’s on your mind, and let everyone in on your quirky point of view. Intellectual and sexy, you continually dodge conventional stereotypes with your eclectic personal style. But when you really break it down, it’s just your great sense of humor and easygoing talent that makes the crowds go wild. Throw a fiesta, and inspire your inner Beck.”

I hate Beck.

I think he’s a charlatan who’s scammed his way into an overlong career (and Winona Ryder’s britches.)

So…does this make me self-loathing?

 
|| May 29, 2001 || 1:42 pm || Comments (0) ||

I was racking my brain to figure out what I should get Maxim for Father’s Day….to my delight, Zapp’s Potato Chips (unavailable in our area) has a site, and you can order by the case via their on-line store! w00t!!

If you hadn’t guessed, Maxim loves Zapp’s, and once again I will earn originality points. Yay for ME.

 
|| May 29, 2001 || 1:17 pm || Comments (0) ||

I took the emode test to find out who my inner rock star is.

Lo and behold, it is Bjork:

“Wow, your inner rock star is Bjork. You’ve charmed the world with your beautiful, zany, personal style. To say you’re a member of the alternative set would be a gross understatement. You and Bjork define alternative in its purest form. You’ve got nothing to prove, it’s your remarkably creative point of view that lets you make art from anything—art, music, politics—whatever makes you passionate. It’s just who you are. You’ve got the courage to experiment with your style and career, and all the while remaining positively sweet and humble. You are as much a free spirit as they come. Celebrate your inner Bjork.”

Drat. While Bjork is perfectly suitable, why couldn’t it be someone like, say for instance, Wendy O. Williams??

 
|| May 29, 2001 || 11:21 am || Comments (0) ||

Someone sent me this link while I was away. I have no idea why, but it was an okay way to kill some minutes.

 
|| May 29, 2001 || 11:12 am || Comments (0) ||

The “Dark Personalities” link has been messed up until now. When you’d click on Justin Hankins’ link, it would send you to an error page on the Dark Personalities site. I kept changing things around, trying to fix them. The site absolutely refused to link. And the Hankins link was always effed-up as well.

It was beginning to freak me out. “Maybe the cosmos is telling me that I should NOT be linking this place!!”

Then, in my brilliance, I noticed something.

A missing ” character. In my code. In reference to that site.

Once again, “It’s because I’m blonde, isn’t it??”

 
|| May 29, 2001 || 10:53 am || Comments (0) ||

I LOVE the fact that someone makes the bold assumption that I would do a click-through on their lame-ass e-mail, especially when the x-mailer line just GLARES OUT at me:

>From: lopaco@aol.com

>To: amazingjettgrrrl@hotmail.com

>Subject: the link

>Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 03:43:53 +0200

>Received: from [213.198.0.60] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBCDC4B78005340043120D5C6003C31900; Mon May 28 18:50:49 2001

>Received: from www.sexy-cams.com (213.198.9.251)by mail11.verio.de (RS ver 1.0.57s) with SMTP id 02424749for amazingjettgrrrl@hotmail.com; Tue, 29 May 2001 03:50:35 +0200 (CEST)

>From lopaco@aol.com Mon May 28 18:51:24 2001

>X-Mailer: sexy-cams.com

>X-Loop-Detect: 1

>

>hi frank,

>

>finally I found the link again

>

>http://www.sexy-cams.com

>

>regards

>

>paco

It’s because I’m blonde, isn’t it??

Tip-off #1: Who on EARTH signs any mail ‘regards’ when they know someone outside a professional affiliation (and even though I didn’t click on the linky-loo, I am surmising that this is not a ‘professional relationship’, if a real one at all)? Tip-off #2: Just take a gander at my fucking e-mail addy…..who in God’s name would have anything remotely close to that? I am ruling out any typos.

And so, on to my reply:

Nice try…now you and your spam fuck off. Kindly don’t darken my inbox again.

Yes, friends, I know I am publicizing their stupid link here. Perhaps they will take it upon themselves to return the click-through and up my hits a smidge. Fair’s fair.